On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:14:41AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The fix looks correct, but care to remind me where we account for the > xlog_op_header for all non-buf, non-inode transaction? We don't. We need to, I just haven't had the time to audit the rest of the reservations to fix them all up yet. AFAIA, only the quota off transactions don't have any slack in them for xlog_op_header space - all the others that are incorrect probably have enough overhead from the buffer overhead roundup to cover the lack ophdr accounting on things like dquots. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
