Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode log reservations are still too small

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The fix looks correct, but care to remind me where we account for the
xlog_op_header for all non-buf, non-inode transaction?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux