On Feb 27, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:37:59PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> Btrfs volume mounts OK, although I don't know if it actually >> withstands significant use. >> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/80784/93470280/ > > I bet that's because nobody has filled a btrfs filesystem past the > point where it tries to access beyond 16TB on a 32 bit system and so > it's never been reported as a bug… :/ Guess what? Someone just ran into what sounded like this very problem today on the Btrfs list [1]. So I reported it and referenced this thread, and it looks like you were correct. Josef is on it [2]. Chris Murphy [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg31856.html [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg31862.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
