On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:03:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > xfs_copy needs a fair bit of work for CRCs because it rewrites > UUIDs by default, but this change will get it working properly > with the "-d" (duplicate) option which keeps the same UUID. I don't think ASSERTs for user supplied data are a good idea, this should be some real error handling. > However, I wonder if we should fail CRC filesystems outright > for now if -d isn't specified, because it will invalidate every > CRC and generally make a mess of things... Yeah, for now it probably should be rejected. It would also be useful to have a list of such issues in an README.v5 or TODO.v5 file in the xfsprogs tree. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
