On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:08:27PM +0000, Filipe David Manana wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 01:22:36PM +0000, Filipe David Manana wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/007 b/tests/btrfs/007 > >> >> index 5df9ccb..5430613 100755 > >> >> --- a/tests/btrfs/007 > >> >> +++ b/tests/btrfs/007 > >> >> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ seq=`basename $0` > >> >> seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq > >> >> echo "QA output created by $seq" > >> >> > >> >> -here=`pwd` > >> >> tmp=`mktemp -d` > >> >> status=1 > >> > > >> > Yeah, redefining $here is a bad thing to do :/ > > > > Right, my mistake. It needs to be defined for the entire test, not > > in a requires function. Hence I think we should just export it from > > check.... > > Hum, ok. So the decision is to let the tests explicitly define the > variable "here", and not export "here" from the main check script. Well, that's the status quo right now. What I'm suggesting is that we should just export it from check and get rid of it from each test as a separate cleanup. i.e. It always needs to be set to the same value (i.e. the root of the xfstests tree) so there is no reason why it should not be set up once in a central location. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
