On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:56:23AM +0000, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
>> To avoid repeating detection of fssum presence in many btrfs tests, as
>> suggested by Dave Chinner.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> common/rc | 7 +++++++
>> tests/btrfs/007 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/016 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/030 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/038 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/039 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/040 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/041 | 5 +----
>> tests/btrfs/042 | 5 +----
>> 9 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>> mode change 100644 => 100755 tests/btrfs/016
>>
>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>> index 5df504c..cce05cc 100644
>> --- a/common/rc
>> +++ b/common/rc
>> @@ -2144,6 +2144,13 @@ _require_cp_reflink()
>> _notrun "This test requires a cp with --reflink support."
>> }
>>
>> +_require_fssum()
>> +{
>> + HERE=`pwd`
>> + FSSUM_PROG=$HERE/src/fssum
>> + [ -x $FSSUM_PROG ] || _notrun "fssum not built"
>> +}
>
> $here is defined by check to be the root of the xfstests instance
> that is running. There's 60+ tests that already us it. Hence:
>
> _require_fssum()
> {
> FSSUM_PROG=$here/src/fssum
> [ -x $FSSUM_PROG ] || _notrun "fssum not built"
> }
>
> Is all you need here.
Hum, doesn't work unless the test file defines $here. At least when
running a single only (.e.g. ./check btrfs/041).
>
>> +
>> # Given 2 files, verify that they have the same mapping but different
>> # inodes - i.e. an undisturbed reflink
>> # Silent if so, make noise if not
>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/007 b/tests/btrfs/007
>> index 5df9ccb..5430613 100755
>> --- a/tests/btrfs/007
>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/007
>> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ seq=`basename $0`
>> seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> echo "QA output created by $seq"
>>
>> -here=`pwd`
>> tmp=`mktemp -d`
>> status=1
>
> Yeah, redefining $here is a bad thing to do :/
See above :)
>
> And I'd missed that this was being done in all the new btrfs tests,
> otherwise I would have pulled it up earlier.
>
> It also points out that the btrfs tests are using a non-standard
> $tmp directory - one that is in the xfstests source directory.
> That's a bad thing, too - tests should be using:
>
> tmp=/tmp/$$
>
> to store small temporary files.
>
> If /tmp is too small for what a test needs, then the test should be
> using $TEST_DIR as the store for the temporary files to exercise
> the filesystem under test as much as possible. e.g. send image
> files build form snapshots of SCRATCH_DEV should be stored on TEST_DIR,
> not in $tmp; filesystem image files that are mounted by loopback
> should be stored on TEST_DIR or SCRATCH_MNT, not $tmp. And so on.
>
> i.e. the idea is that you direct as much of the IO to the test_DIR
> and SCRATCH_MNT as possible, not to the filesystem that is hosting
> $tmp or the xfstests source directory....
Right. Sounds like a separate patch (to use TEST_DIR/$$ for e.g. as a
place to store temporary test data).
Thanks Dave
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Filipe David Manana,
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
