On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:24:27AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I can fix this one easily - we already have a workqueue for doing > > async log pushes (will split the stack between xlog_cil_force_lsn > > and xlog_cil_push), but the reason we haven't used it for synchronous > > log forces is that screws up fsync performance on CFQ. We don't > > recommend CFQ with XFS anyway, so I think I'll make this change > > anyway. > > Dave, the patch below should chop off the stack usage from > xfs_log_force_lsn() issuing IO by deferring it to the CIL workqueue. > Can you given this a run? Looks like it's survived an overnight run.. Dave _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
