On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:29:30PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 14:25, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 08:51:46PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:44:11PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > >> > >>> I'll try to put something along those lines together, if you or Oleg don't > >>> do it first. > >> > >> OK, having looked at that stuff... > >> > >> 1) things become much more compact if we finish conversion to get_signal() > >> first. > > > > I have vague memories that Richard sent out a series to convert over all > > architectures a while ago. Hopefully he has better memory than I do. > > Yeah. Sending v2 of that series is on my overflowing TODO list. :-\ > I think this is a good reason for me to start working on that series again. > Stay tuned. Would be great. I have several done here, but I'll be glad to replace them with something tested... BTW, Oleg, could you explain why does PTRACE_PEEK_SIGINFO copy ->si_code separately? IOW, why do we want the upper 16 bits of ->si_code exposed? It used to be a strictly internal thing IIRC (it's been what, 2.3.late?) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
