> > > BTW, folks, any suggestions about the name of that "memory stream" thing? > > > struct iov_iter really implies iterator for iovec and more generic name > > > would probably be better... struct mem_stream would probably do if nobody > > > comes up with better variant, but it's long and somewhat clumsy... > > > > I don't like 'stream'. To me that sounds more strictly advancing than I > > think this'd be capable of. Maybe something dirt simple like 'mem_vec'? > > With 'mvec_' call prefixes? > > Umm... Frankly, I would rather discourage attempts to read the same data > twice, if only on the naming level... Ahh, OK, sure. mem_iter? - z _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
