On 01/27/2014 10:42 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:46:58PM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
Arkadiusz,
Thanks for compiling the list.
The for-3.1.12 Branch created from "a547280... 3.1.11 release"
If there are others you want committed, please let me know.
Thanks
--Rich
The following have been committed from the candidate list
provided by Arkadiusz:
40c65a7... xfs_metadump: Make -F (force) optional
ec3a1f1... xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair
8660952... xfsprogs: suggest "-d" option for repair of RO mount
5a8206c... xfs_repair: correct docs for "-t" units
0d5c444... xfs_fsr: fix SWAPEXT failures under selinux
f3d3dae... libxfs: fix root inode handling inconsistencies
Introduces this compiler warning in db/init.c:
init.c: In function ¿init¿:
init.c:152:3: warning: implicit declaration of function ¿xfs_initialize_perag_data¿ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
cf507b6... xfsprogs: remove xfs_check references from fsck.xfs
script & manpage
6e2f2d1... xfsprogs: fix resource leak in longform_dir2_rebuild()
ecde3f9... xfs_repair: test for bad level in dir2 node
d299df7... xfs_repair: avoid segfault if reporting progress early in repair
e660c2e... Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 12:38:11 AM Subject:
Bug#725971: xfsprogs: config.guess/config.sub out of date for arm64
5e1c7ac... xfsprogs: handle symlinks etc in fs_table_initialise_mounts()
aba6204... xfsprogs: fix return value of verify_set_primary_sb()
a2ea195... xfsprogs: fix potential memory leak in verify_set_primary_sb()
3e53939... xfsprogs: fix potential memory leak in repare/sb.c
820b8c2... xfsprogs: avoid array overflow in pf_batch_read()
2a1dcdb... xfs_repair: zero out unused parts of superblocks
982508b... xfsprogs: fix inode crash in xfs_repair
Introduces this compiler warning in repair/phase6.c:
phase6.c: In function ¿mk_orphanage¿:
phase6.c:895:3: warning: implicit declaration of function ¿alloc_ex_data¿ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
Running some smoke testing on the branch now. Rich, I expect that
you'll be doing some in-depth functionality, scalability and stress
testing of the branch over the next week or two?
I will do *some* testing yes. This is more for those who are interested
in this branch. I do not plan on using it myself. I put it out there for
those interested in a 3.1.12 release.
Thanks
--Rich
Cheers,
Dave.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
