On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 01:36:47AM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:27:53PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: >> >> From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Enable O_TMPFILE support in linkat(). >> >> For more info, please refer to: >> >> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-08/msg00341.html >> > >> > Generall you should provide all reasonable information in the changelog >> > instead of linking to it. >> will apply this, thanks. >> > >> >> + if (sip->i_d.di_nlink == 0) >> >> + tres = &M_RES(mp)->tr_link_tmpfile; >> >> + else >> >> + tres = &M_RES(mp)->tr_link; >> > >> > As mentioned before I think Dave wanted you to always use the same >> > reservation, but I'll leave that discussion to him. >> If as you said, when some tons of regular files are created, it won't >> waste some disk space? e.g. some files want to reserve some space, but >> get NOSPACE due to other files reserving additional space? > > This is a log space reservation, not a disk space reservation. End > either way, what is unused by the transaction is returned to the > free space pool at the end of the transaction. So for simplicity, > we should just use the one reservation for the link transaction - > take whichever is larger at calculation time. Good explaination, thanks Dave and Christoph. By the way, can you help check if the log reservation for adding/removing one inode to/from unlinked list is correct? or will you check after i post next version out? > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Regards, Zhi Yong Wu _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
