On 12/11/13 05:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Btw, I really think we need to get rid of abusing the AIL for
tracking EFIs during log recovery before looking at the various
leaks in this area. I've actually got a lightly tested patch for
that, but didn't make much progress on that series. If you have
and interest in that area and some spare QA cycles I'd recommend
to base this on the patch below:
---
From b90935eaba9eb13c67101e5d723513bc6ca6e722 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:11:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: simplify EFI/EFD recovery
Use a cancellation table, similar to how we handle buffers instead of
abusing the AIL during recovery.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c | 8 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h | 6 --
fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h | 1 +
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 183 +++++++++++++--------------------------------
4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
Good idea to remove EFI item recovery from the AIL. It may take some
time before I get to it.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
