On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 07:24:28AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 11/7/13, 2:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:20:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> that's right, it's a known bug w/ a testcase but no fix yet. > >> > >> I looked a bit, but ugh, xfsdump. > > > > Maybe it's time you come up with an xfail mechanism at least? > > What's the proposal there, a "fail" group for things known to still > fail everywhere? > > so i.e. ./check -x fail ? I can easily send a patch for that if > that's what folks want. A mechnism to annotate a test as xfail, so that check would output them at the end ala: Expected failures: common/263 Unexpected successes: reiser4/001 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
