On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:03:37PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 09/02/13 05:52, Dave Chinner wrote: > >Hi folks, > > > >These failures are a result of order-4 allocations being done on v5 > >filesystems to support the large ACL count xattrs. The first patch > >puts out usual falbback to vmalloc workaround in place. The second > >patch factors all the places we now have this fallback-to-vmalloc > >and makes it transparent to the callers. > > > >Cheers, > > > >Dave. > > Thanks for clean up. Broken record time: Do we really need order > allocation in the filesystem? Esp in xfs_ioctl.c. I don't understand your question. Are you asking why we need high order allocation? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
