On 09/02/13 05:52, Dave Chinner wrote:
Hi folks, These failures are a result of order-4 allocations being done on v5 filesystems to support the large ACL count xattrs. The first patch puts out usual falbback to vmalloc workaround in place. The second patch factors all the places we now have this fallback-to-vmalloc and makes it transparent to the callers. Cheers, Dave.
Thanks for clean up. Broken record time: Do we really need order allocation in the filesystem? Esp in xfs_ioctl.c.
--Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs