On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 11:51 -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Zhong,
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:15:27AM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:38 -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > Hey Rich and Li Zhong,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:51:11AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> > > > Looks good, thanks for the patch Li Zhong. it has been committed.
> > > >
> > > > --Rich
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > commit e7c05095f5baa9cd2e35a6de03d7dd9f51dd3910
> > > > Author: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Mon Aug 12 06:11:01 2013 +0000
> > > >
> > > > xfsprogs: fix Out-of-bounds access in repair/dinode.c
> > > >
> > > > On 08/12/2013 01:11 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
> > > > >Following is reported by coverity in bug 1061528:
> > > > >
> > > > >187 __dirty_no_modify_ret(dirty);
> > > > >
> > > > >CID 1061528 (#1 of 1): Out-of-bounds access (OVERRUN)53. overrun-buffer-arg: Overrunning array "dinoc->di_pad" of 6 bytes by passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 15 using argument "16UL".
> > > > >188 memset(dinoc->di_pad, 0, 16);
> > > > >
> > > > >It seems that di_pad here should be di_pad2, as sekharan pointed out.
> > > > >
> > > > >Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >---
> > > > > repair/dinode.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > >diff --git a/repair/dinode.c b/repair/dinode.c
> > > > >index e607f0b..94bf2f8 100644
> > > > >--- a/repair/dinode.c
> > > > >+++ b/repair/dinode.c
> > > > >@@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ clear_dinode_core(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dinode_t *dinoc, xfs_ino_t ino_num)
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> > > > >- if (dinoc->di_pad[i] != 0) {
> > > > >+ if (dinoc->di_pad2[i] != 0) {
> > > > > __dirty_no_modify_ret(dirty);
> > > > >- memset(dinoc->di_pad, 0, 16);
> > > > >+ memset(dinoc->di_pad2, 0, 16);
> > > > > break;
> > > > > }
> > > > > }
> > >
> > > We also discussed this issue a bit in this thread:
> > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-08/msg00228.html
> > >
> > > Looks like the loop itself is incorrect and should be removed, and Eric has
> > > suggested that the conditional be changed to a memcmp in case the size of the
> > > pad changes in the future. Would either of you care to spin up another patch
> > > to clean it up?
> >
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > If I understand correctly, we need to change 16 to be a sizeof the
> > di_pad2 array(like the fix attached below)?
> >
> > It seems to me that the loop is needed to check all of the 16 entries in
> > the array?
>
> You are correct. We need the loop...
>
> > Thanks, Zhong
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/repair/dinode.c b/repair/dinode.c
> > index b2b9a95..7469fc8 100644
> > --- a/repair/dinode.c
> > +++ b/repair/dinode.c
> > @@ -182,10 +182,10 @@ clear_dinode_core(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dinode_t *dinoc, xfs_ino_t ino_num)
> > platform_uuid_copy(&dinoc->di_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid);
> > }
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(dinoc->di_pad2)/sizeof(dinoc->di_pad2[0]); i++) {
>
> Just sizeof(dinoc->di_pad2) would be enough here, right? No need for the
> division I think.
I think the division could be used to calculate the number of elements
in the array(16). But yes, in this case, as the element in the array is
1 byte in size, so it's the same whether we add the division or not.
>
> > if (dinoc->di_pad2[i] != 0) {
> > __dirty_no_modify_ret(dirty);
> > - memset(dinoc->di_pad2, 0, 16);
> > + memset(dinoc->di_pad2, 0, sizeof(dinoc->di_pad2));
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> That guy will return 16, so we'll memset off the end of di_pad2.
> sizeof(dinoc->di_pad2[0]) would work.
I think we need to memset the whole array, if we find some non-zero
value there.
Thanks, Zhong
>
> Thanks!
> -Ben
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
