Hey Rich and Li Zhong,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:51:11AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Looks good, thanks for the patch Li Zhong. it has been committed.
>
> --Rich
>
> Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
>
> commit e7c05095f5baa9cd2e35a6de03d7dd9f51dd3910
> Author: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Aug 12 06:11:01 2013 +0000
>
> xfsprogs: fix Out-of-bounds access in repair/dinode.c
>
> On 08/12/2013 01:11 AM, Li Zhong wrote:
> >Following is reported by coverity in bug 1061528:
> >
> >187 __dirty_no_modify_ret(dirty);
> >
> >CID 1061528 (#1 of 1): Out-of-bounds access (OVERRUN)53. overrun-buffer-arg: Overrunning array "dinoc->di_pad" of 6 bytes by passing it to a function which accesses it at byte offset 15 using argument "16UL".
> >188 memset(dinoc->di_pad, 0, 16);
> >
> >It seems that di_pad here should be di_pad2, as sekharan pointed out.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > repair/dinode.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/repair/dinode.c b/repair/dinode.c
> >index e607f0b..94bf2f8 100644
> >--- a/repair/dinode.c
> >+++ b/repair/dinode.c
> >@@ -183,9 +183,9 @@ clear_dinode_core(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_dinode_t *dinoc, xfs_ino_t ino_num)
> > }
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
> >- if (dinoc->di_pad[i] != 0) {
> >+ if (dinoc->di_pad2[i] != 0) {
> > __dirty_no_modify_ret(dirty);
> >- memset(dinoc->di_pad, 0, 16);
> >+ memset(dinoc->di_pad2, 0, 16);
> > break;
> > }
> > }
We also discussed this issue a bit in this thread:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-08/msg00228.html
Looks like the loop itself is incorrect and should be removed, and Eric has
suggested that the conditional be changed to a memcmp in case the size of the
pad changes in the future. Would either of you care to spin up another patch
to clean it up?
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
