On 08/23/2013 09:57 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 08/23/13 08:30, Brian Foster wrote: >> On 08/23/2013 09:18 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote: >>> On 08/22/13 13:28, Brian Foster wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I hit an assert on a debug kernel while beating on some finobt work and >>>> eventually reproduced it on unmodified/TOT xfs/xfsprogs as of today. I >>>> hit it through a couple different paths, first while running >>>> fsstress on >>>> a CRC enabled filesystem (with otherwise default mkfs options): >>>> >>>> (These tests are running on a 4p, 4GB VM against a 100GB virtio disk, >>>> hosted on a single spindle desktop box). >>> >>> Eeek. >>> >>> So both crashes are directory related. What is the top XFS kernel commit >>> for these tests? >>> >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> It was the latest from at some point yesterday. I don't think I've >> pulled since, so I'm at: >> >> 3e3c51ce xfs: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field >> >>> Have you seen this on earlier versions of the kernel? >>> >> >> Well I hit an issue first on my dev. branch for finobt hacking, which is >> currently based on a slightly older commit: >> >> 2c2bcc07 xfs: call roundup_64() to calculate the min_logblks >> >> Unfortunately I don't have the precise error/stack from that failure on >> hand to double check whether it's the exact same failure. I can try to >> regenerate it a bit later today. >> >> Brian >> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> --Mark. >> > Good, I just want to make sure the common directory mods for the file > type patch was not the cause. I will try to recreate it too. > And just to confirm, I can hit the assert from both tests on a 2c2bcc07 kernel (pre-dirent ftype change). Brian > Thanks. > > --Mark. > > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
