On 2013-07-29, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The "version" of XFS that you are running is that of the > kernel you are running. i.e. 2.6.32-279.x.y or 2.6.32-358.x.y. Can't you fairly easily replace a kernel module with a different version using something like DKMS? I feel like I did that with xfs a few months ago. If accurate, then it's theoretically possible to run a different version of the xfs kernel module than the running kernel version. (And if I'm misremembering then there really is no spoon!) --keith -- kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
