Re: [PATCH] xfstests: exit out if _scratch_mount fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/26/13 11:33 AM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Josef, Eric,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:15:13AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 7/26/13 11:12 AM, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> Hey Josef,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>>> I test some of the different mkfs options for btrfs, one set doesn't work
>>>> properly with small file systems, so the fs won't mount.  This is fine from a
>>>> btrfs point of view, but tests that fail to mount the scratch fs will run
>>>> anyway, so if it's a "fill the fs" sort of test this will wreak havoc.  To fix
>>>> this just error out of _scratch_mount fails.  Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> I noticed that this change causes dmapi tests to try to be run on systems that
>>> don't have dmapi supported, and they fail.  Have you seen this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> 	Ben
>>
>> I haven't tested either way, but does:
>>
>>      _mount -t $FSTYP `_scratch_mount_options $*` || _fail "Scratch mount failed"
>>
>> work any better?
> 
> This still fails like so:
> 
> xfs/142  [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad)
> --- tests/xfs/142.out       2013-05-17 14:23:16.000000000 -0500
> +++ /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad  2013-07-26 11:31:00.128200302 -0500
> @@ -1,232 +1,8 @@
> QA output created by 142
> -Attribute tests beginning...
> -Report: success with set #0.
> -Report: success with set #1.
> -Report: success with set #2.
> -Report: success with set #3.
> -Report: success with set #4.
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/142.out /root/xfstests/results/xfs/142.out.bad' to see the entire diff)

Hm, well, _dmapi_scratch_mount tries a mount, and then does a _notrun if that fails.

Josef's patch calls a _fail (or an exit) if mount fails, and it never gets to "notrun"
in _dmapi_scratch_mount.

So for this test it's an expected mount failure, which changes things a bit.

Still, not quite sure why the test continues after either exit 1 or _fail.

But my bash is rusty...

-Eric

> Thanks,
> 	Ben
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux