On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >>>> >>>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? >>> >>> Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( >> >> Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! >> >> I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! >> >> -Eric >> >>> Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. > > Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba? Do your server and client > versions of these support 64 bit inodes? If these are 32 bit Windows > clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit > inodes. Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem. We need more > information. > > -- > Stan UPDATE Latest 64 bit Firefox/Thunderflop work just fine via inode64. Testing other apps but so far so good. Some plugins may be an issue but those may as well be local. - aurf _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
