On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 07:34:17AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > I don't see any problem with doing that, though I would like to keep > some of it separate - the dir2 stuff is complex enough that I would > like to keep it separate, but stuff like all the log item format > headers can be aggregated. > > How about we end up with xfs_log_format.h for the log and log item > formats, xfs_da_format.h for all the dir2/da/attr format definitions, > and xfs_format.h for everything else? Sounds reasonable. > > - any chance to reorder the inode.c split so that stuff doesn't get > > move around multiple times? > > I was waiting for that question - I have been considering doing that > but I've been putting it off because it is a fair bit of shuffling > that I'd have to do from scratch. Sounds like another vote for :redo > it"... Maybe wait for the discussion about having the trans stuff and the separate project quotas to go in before this, as it would mean another big redo.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
