Hi Dave, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:05:46PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:49:15PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:39:11PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > > On 05/27/2013 02:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > We write the superblock every 30s or so which results in the > > > > verifier being called. Right now that results in this output > > > > every 30s: > > > > > > > > XFS (vda): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled! > > > > Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk! > > > > > > > > And spamming the logs. > > > > > > > > We don't need to check for whether we support v5 superblocks or > > > > whether there are feature bits we don't support set as these are > > > > only relevant when we first mount the filesytem. i.e. on superblock > > > > read. Hence for the write verification we can just skip all the > > > > checks (and hence verbose output) altogether. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Applied. > > Ben, while I see this in the xfsdev tree, I don't see it in Linus' > tree. Did it get missed on the recent merges? If so, can you queue > it up for 3.10-rc6? Argh. I missed it in the shuffle. I'll queue it up for 3.10-rc6. Apologies, and a nice catch. -Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
