On 05/27/2013 02:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We write the superblock every 30s or so which results in the
> verifier being called. Right now that results in this output
> every 30s:
>
> XFS (vda): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled!
> Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!
>
> And spamming the logs.
>
> We don't need to check for whether we support v5 superblocks or
> whether there are feature bits we don't support set as these are
> only relevant when we first mount the filesytem. i.e. on superblock
> read. Hence for the write verification we can just skip all the
> checks (and hence verbose output) altogether.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index f6bfbd7..e8e310c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,8 @@ STATIC int
> xfs_mount_validate_sb(
> xfs_mount_t *mp,
> xfs_sb_t *sbp,
> - bool check_inprogress)
> + bool check_inprogress,
> + bool check_version)
> {
>
> /*
> @@ -337,9 +338,10 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
>
> /*
> * Version 5 superblock feature mask validation. Reject combinations the
> - * kernel cannot support up front before checking anything else.
> + * kernel cannot support up front before checking anything else. For
> + * write validation, we don't need to check feature masks.
> */
> - if (XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) == XFS_SB_VERSION_5) {
> + if (check_version && XFS_SB_VERSION_NUM(sbp) == XFS_SB_VERSION_5) {
> xfs_alert(mp,
> "Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled!\n"
> "Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!");
> @@ -675,7 +677,8 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
>
> static int
> xfs_sb_verify(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp)
> + struct xfs_buf *bp,
> + bool check_version)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> struct xfs_sb sb;
> @@ -686,7 +689,8 @@ xfs_sb_verify(
> * Only check the in progress field for the primary superblock as
> * mkfs.xfs doesn't clear it from secondary superblocks.
> */
> - return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb, bp->b_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR);
> + return xfs_mount_validate_sb(mp, &sb, bp->b_bn == XFS_SB_DADDR,
> + check_version);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -719,7 +723,7 @@ xfs_sb_read_verify(
> goto out_error;
> }
> }
> - error = xfs_sb_verify(bp);
> + error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, true);
>
> out_error:
> if (error) {
> @@ -758,7 +762,7 @@ xfs_sb_write_verify(
> struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_fspriv;
> int error;
>
> - error = xfs_sb_verify(bp);
> + error = xfs_sb_verify(bp, false);
> if (error) {
> XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp, bp->b_addr);
> xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, error);
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
