On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 04:52 -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote: > Hi! I seem to have no luck in getting v8 of the pquota/uquota patchset > working and have it pass xfstests with flying colors. Is v8 of the > pquota/gquota patchset sufficient to make the new separate pquota/gquota > bits work? Or is it an incremental patchset? Hi Michael, I will post the user level changes that accompanies these changes. With those changes you can do a new mkfs and use pquota and gquota together. Regards, Chandra > > The basic functionality works, in my opinion, and I hope nobody wastes > time with a nice, educated reply. It would be mostly wasted on me and > is better saved for somebody else. A reply of "do this...and > this...btw, how did this test come out?" would be welcomed, though ;-) > > Anyway, some vague observations as I grasp for straws... > > 1) The xfstests quota group tests seem to fail in different ways than > the way they did before applying the patches. > > 2) Nothing has oopsed. > > 3) In testing using the `xfs_quota -x` command, the patches seem to > work. On `mount -t xfs -o gquota` mounts, using the quota command from > within the xfs_quota shell, the group quotas show but not the projid > quotas. On `mount -t xfs -o pquota` mounts, the projid quotas show but > not the gquota mounts. This is different than the old behavior, where > the gquota numbers might be recycled into projid numbers. > > 4) The results of `xfsquota -c print` are confusing. Maybe they're > showing the XFS view when they show things like > 'uqnoenforce,gquota,pquota' for a mount that is gquota only. They're > doubly confusing once /etc/projid and /etc/projects have been set up. > The 'gqnoenforce' and 'pqnoenforce' flags show up at times for reasons > that are unknown to me. > > 5) `mount -t xfs -o gquota,pquota` is not possible at this time. > > 6) The patches applied cleanly to a git Linux 3.10-rc1 kernel + xfs-oss, > with only whitespace errors reported. > > 7) I question whether 'bsoft=' has a visible effect on projid quotas, > whether using your patches or not. Did it ever work? > > 8) I had no feel on whether the filesystem had to be mounted once as > gquota, then once as pquota, for the full dual functionality to work. > > 9) It looks like xfs_repair doesn't ruin anything, but the `xfsquota -c > print` output looks a little different on the next mount. > > That's about all that could be put together in a coherent manner. Sleep > awaits. > > The PC is a 32-bit Pentium 4. In addition to the kernel mentioned in > (6), there are a few J. Liu and Dave Chinner patches applied as well. > > Best of luck! > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
