On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 15:06 (+0200), Rich Johnston wrote: > On 04/26/2013 08:10 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:35 AM, Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, April 26, 2013 at 07:29 (+0200), Eric Sandeen wrote: >>>> Tests after 276 were failing because the background fsstress >>>> hadn't quit prior to exit, devices couldn't be unmounted, etc. >>> >>> I don't see how that would happen. Any further insight? >>> >> Yes, sorry for not including it. The parent process was killed, but the >> fsstress processes just got reparented to init. >> >> I tried for a while to use pkill to knock them of first but this seems >> simpler, actually. >> >> Eric >> > > Jan, with Eric's explanation, may I put your Reviewed-by: on this patch? Yes, you may :-) -Jan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
