On 04/26/2013 08:10 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:35 AM, Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, April 26, 2013 at 07:29 (+0200), Eric Sandeen wrote:
Tests after 276 were failing because the background fsstress
hadn't quit prior to exit, devices couldn't be unmounted, etc.
I don't see how that would happen. Any further insight?
Yes, sorry for not including it. The parent process was killed, but the fsstress processes just got reparented to init.
I tried for a while to use pkill to knock them of first but this seems simpler, actually.
Eric
Jan, with Eric's explanation, may I put your Reviewed-by: on this patch?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
