On 03/15/2013 08:46 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with fixing them up. Should I?
Eric,
I was going to revert and resubmit as test 306, is that OK with you?
On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:01:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing
sanity tests of: filesystem show, label, sync, and device stats
(sync is included just because it's simple). These are mostly
just smoke tests, although for example show by label & UUID
should verify that the correct fs was shown.
This also add2730c49a3s quite a few new filters to accommodate the output
of the new commands.
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V2: sort & uniq device stats output to account for variable
nrs. of devices. Optionally check that the proper nr. of
devices was returned, as well.
V3: _filter_uuid needs to pay attention to $1, not hope
that the caller has set $UUID. Oops.
V4: fix stats filter to set UNIQ_OPT in both cases, ugh.
Something I just noticed in this commit:
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common.rc
+. ./btrfs.filter
That should probably have been named "common.filter.btrfs".
Dave,
Do you want me to rename btrfs.filter to common.filter.btrfs when I
resubmit this patch?
Regards
--Rich
I found this updating my patchset that moves all the common.* files
into a common/ directory....
I'll rename it to common/filter.btrfs....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
