Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with fixing them up. Should I? On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:01:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing >> sanity tests of: filesystem show, label, sync, and device stats >> (sync is included just because it's simple). These are mostly >> just smoke tests, although for example show by label & UUID >> should verify that the correct fs was shown. >> >> This also adds quite a few new filters to accommodate the output >> of the new commands. >> >> Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> V2: sort & uniq device stats output to account for variable >> nrs. of devices. Optionally check that the proper nr. of >> devices was returned, as well. >> >> V3: _filter_uuid needs to pay attention to $1, not hope >> that the caller has set $UUID. Oops. >> >> V4: fix stats filter to set UNIQ_OPT in both cases, ugh. > > Something I just noticed in this commit: > >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks >> +. ./common.rc >> +. ./btrfs.filter > > That should probably have been named "common.filter.btrfs". > I found this updating my patchset that moves all the common.* files > into a common/ directory.... > > I'll rename it to common/filter.btrfs.... > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
