On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:19:21 +1100, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > FIO is very flexible io generator, I would call it IO swiss knife. > > Currently we have tonns of hardcoded application which reproduces > > some predefined scenario. This approach has obvious dissadvantages > > 1) Lack of flexability: one written it is hard to modify it in future > > 2) Code base is large, many routines written again and again > > > > At the same time add new fio based tast is just add simle INI file. > > This greatly simplify code review. I do beleve that some day we will > > replace most of hardcoded io binaries with fio. > > > > One who is planning to run $FIO_PROG should first check that system > > contains appropriate version which is able to handle jobfile > > for example: _require_fio 286-job.fio > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Dimitry, > > Can you rebase this series on top of a current xfstests tree? It Ohhh. I use git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git > doesn't apply without conflicts or trying to land on top of existing > files, so that makes it hard to actually test and do a final review > on.... Will do ASAP. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > -- > Dave Chinner > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
