On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:37:13PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > FIO is very flexible io generator, I would call it IO swiss knife. > Currently we have tonns of hardcoded application which reproduces > some predefined scenario. This approach has obvious dissadvantages > 1) Lack of flexability: one written it is hard to modify it in future > 2) Code base is large, many routines written again and again > > At the same time add new fio based tast is just add simle INI file. > This greatly simplify code review. I do beleve that some day we will > replace most of hardcoded io binaries with fio. > > One who is planning to run $FIO_PROG should first check that system > contains appropriate version which is able to handle jobfile > for example: _require_fio 286-job.fio > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Dimitry, Can you rebase this series on top of a current xfstests tree? It doesn't apply without conflicts or trying to land on top of existing files, so that makes it hard to actually test and do a final review on.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
