On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:08:20AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is v4 of the spinlock recursion fix. The only update is to the comment in > patch 1. These changes have been run through the reproducer over the weekend > without a failure. > > I've also run another xfstests run while including the following patch from Dave: > > xfs: xfs_bmap_add_attrfork_local is too generic > > ... due to seeing the same issue Lukas reproduced in test 013 (I saw it in 070 as > well). That problem no longer occurs with this patch included, but I have hit > an error in test 178 that didn't fire in my baseline run. It persists if I revert > back to TOT, so I'm posting this set as is and I'll see if I can trace where that > one came from... Applied these two. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
