Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes: >> Just to be clear, are you saying you would like me to remove the >> mutex_lock/unlock pair from ext4_sync_file? (I had already factored out >> the common code between this new code path and the fsync path in my tree.) > Yes, after some thinking I came to that conclusion. We actually need to > keep i_mutex around ext4_flush_unwritten_io() to avoid livelocks but the > rest doesn't need it. The change should be definitely a separate patch just > in case there's something subtle I missed and we need to bisect in > future... I've attached a patch for that so that blame for bugs goes my way > ;) Compile tested only so far. I'll give it some more testing overnight. Great, thanks Jan! I'll include this in the next posting. Cheers, Jeff _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
