On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:01:49PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 11/15/12 14:48, Dave Chinner wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:55:47AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > >>The xfs_quota program does not generate output with V2 which causes > >>xfstest 050 to fails. > > > >I don't think that has anything to do with this patch orthechange > >for V2 - V2 only changes quotacheck behaviour, and that doesn't > >impact xfs_quota behaviour. The test passes just fine here: > > > >$ sudo ./check 050 > >FSTYP -- xfs (debug) > >PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test-2 3.7.0-rc5-dgc+ > >MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb > >MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/scratch > > > >050 14s ... 15s > >Ran: 050 > >Passed all 1 tests > > > >So perhaps there's something else going wrong on your machine? > > I will do more investigating. With V2 050 output: > > QA output created by 050 > *** user > meta-data=DDEV isize=XXX agcount=N, agsize=XXX blks > data = bsize=XXX blocks=XXX, imaxpct=PCT > = sunit=XXX swidth=XXX, unwritten=X > naming =VERN bsize=XXX > log =LDEV bsize=XXX blocks=XXX > realtime =RDEV extsz=XXX blocks=XXX, rtextents=XXX > > *** report no quota settings > > *** report initial settings > > *** push past the soft inode limit > > *** push past the soft block limit Curious. There aren't any errors in the syslog/dmesg saying that buffers failed verification during the quota check runs, are there? Also, what platform are you testing on? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
