Re: Slow performance after ~4.5TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:58:15PM +0200, Linas Jankauskas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> /dev is automaticaly mounted by automount and it is always equal to
> half physical memory.

Is it? It's not on my RHEL6.3 boxes - it's got a 10MB udev
filesystem mounted on /dev. Anyway, irrelelvant.

> RAID geometry:
>  Logical Drive: 1
>          Size: 20.0 TB
>          Fault Tolerance: RAID 5
...
>          Strip Size: 64 KB

Ok, so su=16, sw=11.

> Here is output of perf top:
> 
> 18.42%  [kernel]            [k] _spin_lock
>  16.07%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_alloc_busy_trim

Whoa, really?

>  10.46%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_alloc_get_rec
>   9.46%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_get_rec
>   8.38%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_increment
>   8.31%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near
>   6.82%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_get_block
>   5.72%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_alloc_compute_aligned
>   4.01%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_readahead
>   3.53%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_rec_offset
>   2.92%  [xfs]               [k] xfs_btree_rec_addr
>   1.30%  [xfs]               [k] _xfs_buf_find

This looks like allocation of extents, not freeing of extents. Can
you attach the entire output?

> strace of rsync process:
> 
> % time     seconds  usecs/call     calls    errors syscall
> ------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
>  99.99   18.362863      165431       111           ftruncate

Which means this must be *extending* files. But an strace is not
what I need right now - the event trace via trace-cmd is what I need
to determine exactly what is happening.  Five seconds of tracing
output while this problem is happening is probably going to be
sufficient.

What I'd really like to know is what type of files you are rsyncing
to this box. can you post your typical rsync command? Are you
rsyncing over the top of existing files, or new copies? How big are
the files? are tehy sparse? what's a typical xfs_bmap -vp output on
one of these files that has taken this long to ftruncate?

Further, I need to know what free space looks like in your
filesystem. the output of something like:

for i in `seq 0 1 19`; do
	echo -s "\nagno: $i\n"
	xfs_db -r -c "freesp -s -a $i" /dev/sda5
done

and this:

xfs_db -r -c "frag" /dev/sda5

While give an indication of the state of freespace in the
filesystem.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux