On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:50:14AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > /*
> > + * run the pre-io callback function if it exists. If this function
> > + * fails it will mark the buffer with an error and the IO should
> > + * not be dispatched.
> > + */
> > + if (bp->b_pre_io) {
> > + bp->b_pre_io(bp);
> > + if (bp->b_error) {
>
> Wouldn't it be a cleaner calling convention to return the erro from the
> callback?
Perhaps. I just wrote it in a manner consistent with the iodone
function where errors are returned in bp->b_error. Other functions
pass buffer errors like this, too - xfs_buf_ioapply_map(),
xfs_buf_read_map(), and _xfs_buf_ioapply() - so it's not unusual,
really..
I can change it, but that involves changing every callback function
as well and I don't see that as really necessary. i.e. they call
xfs_buf_ioerror() already, so do we really need to have them return
bp->b_error as well?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
