On 10/18/12 12:04, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:05:32AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
On 10/18/12 11:00, Dave Howorth wrote:
Mark Tinguely wrote:
Would "Indicates that XFS is allowed to create inodes at locations up to
32 bits of significance .."
I prefer the original wording. Your suggestion says something about what
XFS can do, but nothing about what it is not allowed to do, which is
rather more important.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
I see your point. Sounds good to me.
--Mark.
This means no change is needed?
I am okay with what is written about creating inodes.
On a separate question, should something be mentioned that inode32 mode
can still read/write/unlink any inode, even those number greater than 32
bit, or will that confuse the inode creation point?
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
