On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:05:32AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 10/18/12 11:00, Dave Howorth wrote: > >Mark Tinguely wrote: > >>Would "Indicates that XFS is allowed to create inodes at locations up to > >>32 bits of significance .." > > > >I prefer the original wording. Your suggestion says something about what > >XFS can do, but nothing about what it is not allowed to do, which is > >rather more important. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >xfs mailing list > >xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > >http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > > I see your point. Sounds good to me. > > --Mark. > This means no change is needed? > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- --Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
