On 10/01/2012 04:28 PM, Richard Ems wrote: > On 02/24/2012 04:17 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> *MKFS* >>>> We also heavily use ACLs for almost all of our files. Christoph Hellwig >>>> suggested in a previous mail to use "-i size=512" on XFS creation, so my >>>> mkfs.xfs would look something like: >>>> >>>> mkfs.xfs -i size=512 -d su=stripe_size,sw=28 -L Backup_2 /dev/sdX1 >> Be sure the stripe geometry matches the way the raid controller is >> set up. >> >> You know the size of your acls, so you can probably do some testing >> to find out how well 512-byte inodes keep ACLs in-line. > > > Hi Eric, > > This is a reply to an email from you sent 7 months ago ... > > How could I do the testing you were proposing? How can I find out if my > 512-byte inodes keep our ACLs in-line? > > I am going to create a similar new RAID set, and wanted to check this > before on the one already in production. > > Thanks, > Richard > Hi again, If the "method" is to use "xfs_bmap -a ..." and check for "no extents", then I found it ! Thanks, sorry for the noise, Richard -- Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
