On 9/13/12 12:53 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:13:15PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 9/13/12 2:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to >>> busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little >>> attention. What do people think about retiring them and using the oss >>> trees exclusively again for now? Right now the trees are getting a bit >>> out of sync which isn't a good thing. >> >> ISTR it was done in response to a .... fear of SGI being less responsive after >> a different type of account purge. ;) >> >> If SGI wants to be responsible for merging all userspace patches as they >> come in on the list, I'm fine with going back to one tree on oss. > > I discussed this with management. SGI is willing to take on the responsibility > of merging all userspace patches. > > I think retiring the -dev trees will resolve the out-of-sync issues we've been > having, and be less confusing for all involved. Sounds like a plan. Will you make sure everything gets re-synced from kernel.org so nothing is lost? hch, you want to remove or somehow deprecate the kernel.org trees? Thanks, -Eric > Regards, > Ben > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
