Hi Eric, On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:13:15PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/13/12 2:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > It seems with the kernel.org account purge last year and me being way to > > busy it seems like the -dev trees of the XFS userspace get very little > > attention. What do people think about retiring them and using the oss > > trees exclusively again for now? Right now the trees are getting a bit > > out of sync which isn't a good thing. > > ISTR it was done in response to a .... fear of SGI being less responsive after > a different type of account purge. ;) > > If SGI wants to be responsible for merging all userspace patches as they > come in on the list, I'm fine with going back to one tree on oss. I discussed this with management. SGI is willing to take on the responsibility of merging all userspace patches. I think retiring the -dev trees will resolve the out-of-sync issues we've been having, and be less confusing for all involved. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
