On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:11:22AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Is it? So we will have long term support kernels for 3.0.x, 3.2.x > and now 3.4.x? 3.0.x is the long term stable kernel I'm targetting > for backports and there's no way I can really handle more than > that... I remember Greg announced 3.4 to be long term in addition to 3.0 recently. 3.2 only is the Debian release kernel, for which the maintainers offered to maintain it as a formal stable release on kernel.org And yes, it's getting not only confusing but also way to much work for subsystem maintainers. I'm still happy to backport fixes to 3.0, but for more invasive work it's getting a bit too old now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
