On 4 July 2012 07:11, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] >> On the one hand I'd love to see these patches go into 3.4-stable as it's >> going to be a long term release, > > Is it? So we will have long term support kernels for 3.0.x, 3.2.x > and now 3.4.x? 3.0.x is the long term stable kernel I'm targetting > for backports and there's no way I can really handle more than > that... That's quite a pity! In production there's often even 2.6.32 since it's chosen as RHEL6's kernel. -- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
