On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:04:00AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset. I think that Jan > > > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()' > > > based upon Dave's suggestions. It's best not to depend upon that either. What > > > do you say, Dave? > > > > I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through > > some testing.... > > Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my > series applied, and thus yours didn't apply. > > I still think reordering is better - I'm quite busy and I'd rather get > your series reviewed first before redoing and retesting the inode > allocator changes. I stand corrected - it doesn't need a rebase - all it needs is to be applied on top of Jan Kara's bug fix. Looking back, that's exactly what I said in patch 0 of the series.... So it should be good to go as Jan's fix needs to go to Linus before 3.5 is released... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
