On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset. I think that Jan > > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()' > > based upon Dave's suggestions. It's best not to depend upon that either. What > > do you say, Dave? > > I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through > some testing.... Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my series applied, and thus yours didn't apply. I still think reordering is better - I'm quite busy and I'd rather get your series reviewed first before redoing and retesting the inode allocator changes. In fact I'll start reviewing them in about 10 minutes after I've finished catching up on email for this morning. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
