On 6/18/12 11:32 AM, Brian Foster wrote: > On 06/18/2012 12:18 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 6/18/12 10:56 AM, Brian Foster wrote: >>> The latest version of xfsdump/restore (3.1.0) causes dump tests >>> to complain. Fix up the filter to include a wider selection of >>> version numbers. >> >> Looks good to me, thanks - I'll merge it, but I think I'll >> add a "^version" to it to make it a little more selective, >> if that's ok with you. >> > > Fine by me, thanks. actually that's wrong, because it puts executable name at the beginning! Sorry. I'll merge it as is, thanks. -Eric > Brian > >> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> common.dump | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/common.dump b/common.dump >>> index ca09ec1..61d3f43 100644 >>> --- a/common.dump >>> +++ b/common.dump >>> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ _dump_filter_main() >>> -e 's/1048576/BLOCKSZ/' \ >>> -e 's/2097152/BLOCKSZ/' \ >>> -e 's/(pid[ ]*[1-9][0-9]*)/\(pid PID\)/' \ >>> - -e '/version 3\.0/d' \ >>> + -e '/version [3-9]\.[0-9]/d' \ >>> -e 's/\/hw\/module.*$/SCRATCH_DEV/' \ >>> -e 's/xfsdump: ino map phase 1: .*/xfsdump: ino map <PHASES>/' \ >>> -e '/xfsdump: ino map phase [2]/,1d' \ >> > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
