On 06/18/2012 12:18 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/18/12 10:56 AM, Brian Foster wrote: >> The latest version of xfsdump/restore (3.1.0) causes dump tests >> to complain. Fix up the filter to include a wider selection of >> version numbers. > > Looks good to me, thanks - I'll merge it, but I think I'll > add a "^version" to it to make it a little more selective, > if that's ok with you. > Fine by me, thanks. Brian > Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> common.dump | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/common.dump b/common.dump >> index ca09ec1..61d3f43 100644 >> --- a/common.dump >> +++ b/common.dump >> @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ _dump_filter_main() >> -e 's/1048576/BLOCKSZ/' \ >> -e 's/2097152/BLOCKSZ/' \ >> -e 's/(pid[ ]*[1-9][0-9]*)/\(pid PID\)/' \ >> - -e '/version 3\.0/d' \ >> + -e '/version [3-9]\.[0-9]/d' \ >> -e 's/\/hw\/module.*$/SCRATCH_DEV/' \ >> -e 's/xfsdump: ino map phase 1: .*/xfsdump: ino map <PHASES>/' \ >> -e '/xfsdump: ino map phase [2]/,1d' \ > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
