On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:36:14PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 05/10/12 13:32, Ben Myers wrote: > > >Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<bpm@xxxxxxx> > > > >Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c > >=================================================================== > >--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c > >+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c > >@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs > > STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *); > > STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xfs_alloc_arg_t *, > > xfs_btree_cur_t *, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *, int *); > >-STATIC void xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *, > >- xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *); > > > > /* > > * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur. > >Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > >=================================================================== > >--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > >+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c > >@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ restart: > > * args->minlen no suitable extent could be found, and the higher level > > * code needs to force out the log and retry the allocation. > > */ > >-STATIC void > >+void > > xfs_extent_busy_trim( > > struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, > > xfs_agblock_t bno, > >Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h > >=================================================================== > >--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h > >+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h > >@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void > > xfs_extent_busy_reuse(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno, > > xfs_agblock_t fbno, xfs_extlen_t flen, bool userdata); > > > >+void > >+xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno, > >+ xfs_extlen_t len, xfs_agblock_t *rbno, xfs_extlen_t *rlen); > >+ > > int > > xfs_extent_busy_ag_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b); > > > > > > Hmmm, I saw that before. I have been hand patching that to test. > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG clears the #define of STATIC. That's where this went off the rails. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
