On 05/10/12 13:32, Ben Myers wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<bpm@xxxxxxx> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c =================================================================== --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *); STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xfs_alloc_arg_t *, xfs_btree_cur_t *, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *, int *); -STATIC void xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *, - xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *); /* * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur. Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c =================================================================== --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ restart: * args->minlen no suitable extent could be found, and the higher level * code needs to force out the log and retry the allocation. */ -STATIC void +void xfs_extent_busy_trim( struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno, Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h =================================================================== --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void xfs_extent_busy_reuse(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno, xfs_agblock_t fbno, xfs_extlen_t flen, bool userdata); +void +xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno, + xfs_extlen_t len, xfs_agblock_t *rbno, xfs_extlen_t *rlen); + int xfs_extent_busy_ag_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b);
Hmmm, I saw that before. I have been hand patching that to test. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
