On 03/27/12 11:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We already flush dirty inodes throug the AIL regularly, there is no reason to have second thread compete with it and disturb the I/O pattern. We still do write inodes when doing a synchronous reclaim from the shrinker or during unmount for now. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@xxxxxx> ---
- */ - return 0; + xfs_iflock(ip); reclaim: xfs_ifunlock(ip);
Is this flush lock / flush unlock cycle needed? Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
